| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Toyota Sequoia vs. Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency | |
 2014 - 2016 Mercedes-Benz E-Class |
Best
158%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2010 - 2013 Mercedes-Benz E-Class |
Best
100%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
 2007 - 2009 Mercedes-Benz E-Class |
Best
121%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
|
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
| ||
 2003 - 2006 Mercedes-Benz E-Class |
Best
88%
Worst
|
See problems for this generation Share on Facebook |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Sequoia
| Toyota Sequoia Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
It is a very solid built vehicle. This is the second one I have owned with no problems what so ever. full 2005 Toyota Sequoia review |
| 2002 | 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
This has been a very reliable car full 2002 Toyota Sequoia review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Toyota Sequoia
| Toyota Sequoia Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
It is a very solid built vehicle. This is the second one I have owned with no problems what so ever. full 2005 Toyota Sequoia review |
| 2002 | 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
This has been a very reliable car full 2002 Toyota Sequoia review |
