| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2016 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Dodge Charger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 120.2 in | -4.2 in |
| Length | 204.0 in | 198.4 in | 5.6 in |
| Width | 80.5 in | 75.0 in | 5.5 in |
| Height | 74.4 in | 58.2 in | 16.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 5466 lb. | 3934 lb. | 1532 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | 7.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.8 in | 38.6 in | 4.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 64.8 in | 59.5 in | 5.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 60.8 in | 56.2 in | 4.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 45.3 in | 41.8 in | 3.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 36.6 in | 2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.1 in | 57.9 in | 7.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.3 in | 56.1 in | 4.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 40.1 in | -1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.1 in | 0.0 in | 38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 62.6 in | 0.0 in | 62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.3 in | 0.0 in | 49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.8 in | 0.0 in | 24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | 81.9 in (over 2 rows) | 27.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.3 ft3 | 16.1 ft3 | -0.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 51.6 ft3 | 16.1 | 35.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 94.7 ft3 | 16.1 ft3 | 78.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
