We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

2003 Chevrolet Tracker Pros and Cons at TrueDelta: Owner Pros and Cons by ianjdyck

IndyIan

0

Sign in or join to like this review.

Reviewed: 2003 Chevrolet Tracker

4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range

Why the 2003 Chevrolet Tracker?

Fuel economy

Highway driving at 55-60 mph yields 27-30 mpg. Very good for a 4wd vehicle with a low range transfer case.

Reliability & durability

Body is tight and rattle free, no major drivetrain issues in the first 100k miles.

Feature availability

Our base model was available with no power interior features or a radio. $150 buys a USB plugin deck these days, how much is a factory radio with that feature?

Why Not the 2003 Chevrolet Tracker?

Powertrain performance

The 4 cylinder is a bit weak at low rpms, I believe this is because there is no knock sensor on the tracker so the timing maps are too conservative. The suzuki vitara clone does have a knock sensor so it should have stronger low end response.

Cargo capacity

Not that much space behind back seats when up, folded down it fits a clothes waching machine or other large boxy objects.

Feature availability

I would like to have manual front hubs available.

Rear seat room & comfort

Its abit small for adults, or large car seats.

Return to top

Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Return to top

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.