◆

Ford Ranger Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Model Year	Body/Powertrain	g/100m
2002	2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-hp 4.0L V6 5-sp manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	6.01	See all data
With the 154 kilowatts 4.0L V6 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and four-wheel drive, part-time w/low range, the 2002 Ford Ranger has been averaging 6.01 L/100km (liters per 100 kilometers). The 2002 Ford Rangers in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 74 kilometers per hour (about 82.3 percent of the kilometers driven). The rest of the kilometers were in the city (17.7 percent), in the suburbs (0 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition, the average 2002 Ford Ranger in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time.
2002	2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-hp 3.0L V6 5-sp automatic RWD	4.55	See all data

2002	2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-hp 2.3L I4 5-sp manual RWD	3.92	See all data

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2002 Ford Ranger

2002 Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2003	2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002	4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001	2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual RWD	V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review