Page 1 of 4 | ||
Page 1 of 4 |
4 comments |
2015 Honda Fit Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Hondas have been lagging the leaders in fuel economy. But with new "Earth Dreams" engines and CVT transmissions (pardon the redundancy), they've closed the gap. When fitted with the CVT (continuously variable transmission), the Fit LX rates 33 mpg city, 41 mpg highway in the EPA's tests. The city rating... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Nissan Versa Note |
13 comments |
2014 Ford Fiesta SE EcoBoost Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The ostensible point of a three-cylinder engine is superior fuel economy. Fewer cylinders generate less friction. On top of this, the Fiesta's new engine is smaller, just one liter compared to the regular Fiesta's 1.6 and the Fit's 1.5. It is turbocharged to compensate for this size difference. The payoff:... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Honda Fit |
2012 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4292 Capable of 40 mpg on the highway with A/C running, 2 passengers and a load of cargo. |
|
2 comments |
2009 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member5723 The fuel economy in this car is great. Only about 15% of my driving is on the highway, and in New England winter I'm still getting about 30mpg, and I don't consider myself to be a very economical driver. |
2013 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member1664 driven normally, fuel economy better than EPA results. (But drops fairly quickly when trying to merge or accelerate along with normal flow of traffic) |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2012 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member81 Owned less than a week but drive home after purchase was 60 miles and indications are the true mileage will exceed the EPA numbers as it shows 36mpg for half city and half congested freeway travel |
|
2007 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in North Carolina, United States We drove the car back to NC from Boston when the car was 3 years old. The trip took a day and a half, and we got better than 40 mpg for large portions of the trip, doing 75 mph on the interstates. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4455 Although we got 38 mpg over the course of our 32,000 miles, we actually got better mileage with our previous 07 Civic over its lifetime and powertrain performance was much better for the Civic. Overall dissapointed with mileage. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member5410 Rated around 30 mpg, but can get up to about 40. |
|
2011 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in Georgia, United States 30 MPG in brutal, city driving; 40+ MPG on the highway. The fuel economy is better than I expected. |
|
2007 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States With the AC off I can average around 33 MPG. With it on, which is necessary in Austin for 9 months out of the year, I still average around 30. |
|
| |
2007 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member5315 Good, not spectacular, economy. |
|
2011 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member5225 Regularly get 32-36 in town, have gotten 40 on the highway. |
|
2011 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4115 30+ MPG even with a lot on stop and go. I got the 5 speed which actually may lower my MPG but I love the ability to punch it when I need to! Wish it had a 6th gear for 70 mph+ I want to see if I can hit 40-45... |
|
2011 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in New Jersey, United States 30 miles per gallon on average in mostly city driving averaging 30 miles per hour or less/stop&go. |
|
2008 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in Florida, United States Driven aggressively it still returns over 30 mpg. Driven conservatively it will deliver 37-38 mpg on the highway. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4880 Loses out slightly to the Fiesta in fuel economy. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4861 33 to 35 mpg highway (but small fuel tank) |
|
2009 Honda Fit Pros and Cons A member in Arizona, United States I rented the car for a weekend & my gas mileage from Phoenix, to Flagstaff & back to Phoenix was only 28.8 mpg This car had an automatic tranny. Engine rmp always sounded BUSY & noisey |
|
2009 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member3593 I love the fuel economy. Generally it averages 35 mpg in mixed-driving. It is so nice to be able to go an entire week on a single tank instead of needing to fill up 2+ times a week. |
|
2009 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4759 I drive my Fit during the work week mainly on the freeway. I appreciate the great fuel economy of 30+ miles per gallon. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member2909 |
|
2007 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member2205 It averages over 25 mpg |
|
2007 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member4569 Consistently high fuel mileage both city and highway driving. |
|
2010 Honda Fit Pros and Cons Member2153 From the start, the Fit has much greater fuel economy than the PT Cruiser. This is the kind of economy the PT Cruiser should have had. Roughly 34 MPG during the first 200 miles. |