Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
16 comments |
2015 Subaru Outback Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Some compact crossovers roughtly match the Subaru Outback's cargo volume specs: 35.5 cubic feet with the second-row seat up and 73.3 cubic feet with it folded. But, with its station wagon proportions, the Outback has a longer cargo floor--nearly 6.5 feet--so it's more useful for people who only pack to... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Jeep Cherokee |
4 comments |
A great vehicle for a specific group of buyers 2014 Jeep Cherokee Pros and Cons Member5043 Cargo space isn't as pleantiful as it is in vehicles in the same class but its enough for me. |
2 comments |
Why I am glad I went with the new Cherokee? 2014 Jeep Cherokee Pros and Cons japajew The rear cargo area is far from being the largest in its class. This would not be an ideal vehicle for taking a family of 5 on a week-long vacation. It is, however, perfect for what most people will use it for; things such as typical shopping runs, outdoor activities,... |
8 comments |
2014 Jeep Cherokee Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Due to a bobbed tail and high floor, the Jeep Cherokee's cargo volume stat, 55 cubic feet, ranks near the bottom of the segment. You can pack nine more cubes into the Terrain, 13 more into the Escape (maybe, Ford tends to get creative when measuring its vehicles), and 20... Comparison vehicle: 2013 GMC Terrain |