Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh With a Ford-supplied 240-horsepower turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine and Aisin six-speed automatic transmission, the Evoque is quick, but not OMG quick. Like the similarly powerful BMW, the Evoque weights about 3,700 pounds. Figure mid-sevens to 60 mph if you don't take extreme measures. Quick enough for me. What I'd... Comparison vehicle: 2013 BMW X1 |
|
2013 BMW X1 xDrive28i Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Mat the go pedal, and the BMW X1 scoots--but too often only after a moment of hesitation. While turbo lag might be a minor factor, the electronic controls probably deserve most if not all of the blame. This hesitation, along with the insufficiently direct steering, prevented a thrillingly tight connection... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|
I love this Evoque 2012 Land-Rover Range Rover Evoque Pros and Cons Member5616 Performance is excellent. The four feels more like a V6. Strong acceleration with lots of torque/turbo pull at low end. I am also amazed at the vehicles off-roading capability - it's great. |
|
2012 Land-Rover Range Rover Evoque Pros and Cons A member in Virginia, United States I don't like the acceleration curve on this car. I understand that it's an SUV and you may well tow a boat. I get that in "Drive" mode. In "Sport", the car should have a be more aggressive in first gear. The Turbo should lag less a |