We are 105,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mazda CX-7 vs. GMC Yukon Reliability

Show details
Results are for year ending December 31, 2015. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
Year Make/Model Repair Trips Per 100 Cars Compared to all models for the same year    
2015 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  20 Yukons, 9.6 months of data per Yukon, average 13700 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2013 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  19 Yukons, 9.4 months of data per Yukon, average 38000 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2011 GMC Yukon 20
10% 10% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  29 Yukons, 8.2 months of data per Yukon, average 57300 miles
2011 Mazda CX-7   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  14 CX-7s, 11.1 months of data per CX-7, average 55200 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2010 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  13 Yukons, 9.3 months of data per Yukon, average 69700 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2009 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  16 Yukons, 6.6 months of data per Yukon, average 92800 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2008 GMC Yukon 75
60% 60% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  29 Yukons, 10.6 months of data per Yukon, average 101300 miles

The 2007 had a similar stat a year ago. Could be peaking.
2008 Mazda CX-7   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  13 CX-7s, 10.2 months of data per CX-7, average 83100 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2007 GMC Yukon 59
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  52 Yukons, 10.1 months of data per Yukon, average 116500 miles

Redesigned for this model year.
2007 Mazda CX-7   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  12 CX-7s, 7.8 months of data per CX-7, average 100600 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2006 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  13 Yukons, 9.6 months of data per Yukon, average 122700 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2005 GMC Yukon 139
100% 100% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  38 Yukons, 9.3 months of data per Yukon, average 117600 miles

The 2005 has had a high higher repair frequency for over a year. Unclear why.

 

2004 GMC Yukon 71
30% 30% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  42 Yukons, 10.1 months of data per Yukon, average 150500 miles

 

2003 GMC Yukon 64
20% 20% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  29 Yukons, 10.3 months of data per Yukon, average 162700 miles

 

2002 GMC Yukon 57
10% 10% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  40 Yukons, 10.0 months of data per Yukon, average 172500 miles

 

2001 GMC Yukon   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  24 Yukons, 9.4 months of data per Yukon, average 179500 miles

* Small sample, members only.

Return to top

Was this information useful?

We're glad we could help! Share this page:

We're so sorry! Tell us how we can improve it.

Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Members can see an exclusive preview of our most recent results.
See reliability results for all SUVs.
See reliability results for all Mazda and GMC vehicles.

Mazda CX-7 vs. GMC Yukon Reliability Comparisons

You won't find Mazda CX-7 or GMC Yukon reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Mazda CX-7 and the GMC Yukon truly differ in reliability.

These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Mazda CX-7 and GMC Yukon reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Mazda CX-7 and the GMC Yukon were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Mazda CX-7 and the GMC Yukon have been recently.

What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Mazda CX-7

blog comments powered by Disqus

What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability and Durability of the Mazda CX-7

Mazda CX-7 Reliability and Durability: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
A can compare quality to that from top German car makers. Never got broken so far. After 2 years interior looks almost like new.
Mazda CX-7 Reliability and Durability: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Poor reliability with constant problems on oil consumption and turbo. Well known issue with this car which Mazda are aware of.
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
been in the shop for a lot of things including recalls
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Ours was an early build model and experienced many powertrain issues within the first eight months, with the car spending more than three weeks cumulatively sitting at the dealer waiting for various parts over the course of two months.
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability and Durability of the GMC Yukon

GMC Yukon Reliability and Durability: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD
Good experience with previous models.
2002 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Reliability has been a mixed bag. It came from the factory with a radiator that leaked into the tranny-oil cooler. GM fixed that under warranty. The computer in the radio died, which drained the battery. The replacement was DOA. Now I have an aftermarket head unit. A couple of little items (the washer bottles, for example) have broken, but I have never worried about the powertrain or the soundness of the body or chassis; and the interior and exterior have held up very well.
2001 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 6.0L V8
4-speed automatic AWD
11 years 187,000 miles and the only thing I have ever had to change besides regular wear/maintenance itemswas a water pump, rear a/c evaporator, 2 window regulators.Extremely comfortable, luxurious,great styling and extremely economical.Power and operationis strong as always.