We are 105,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Volvo S60 vs. Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reliability

Show details
Results are for year ending December 31, 2015. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
Year Make/Model Repair Trips Per 100 Cars Compared to all models for the same year    
2015 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  10 E-Classes, 10.2 months of data per E-Class, average 6300 miles

* Very small sample, members only.
2015 Volvo S60 22
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  30 S60s, 9.0 months of data per S60, average 10300 miles

 

2014 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 20
30% 30% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  43 E-Classes, 9.7 months of data per E-Class, average 16300 miles

Refreshed for this model year. Reliable so far.
2014 Volvo S60   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  11 S60s, 9.8 months of data per S60, average 18300 miles

* Very small sample, members only.

 

2013 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  17 E-Classes, 4.9 months of data per E-Class, average 30300 miles

* Small sample, members only.
2013 Volvo S60 27
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  35 S60s, 10.1 months of data per S60, average 24800 miles

 

2012 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 59
90% 90% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  29 E-Classes, 8.5 months of data per E-Class, average 32900 miles
2012 Volvo S60 23
30% 30% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  32 S60s, 8.1 months of data per S60, average 39200 miles

 

2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 49
70% 70% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  28 E-Classes, 9.7 months of data per E-Class, average 41400 miles

 

2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 31
30% 30% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  34 E-Classes, 7.9 months of data per E-Class, average 53800 miles

Redesigned for this model year.

 

2009 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  16 E-Classes, 10.0 months of data per E-Class, average 67300 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2008 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  20 E-Classes, 10.3 months of data per E-Class, average 68000 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2007 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 55
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  29 E-Classes, 9.8 months of data per E-Class, average 83700 miles

Refreshed for this model year.
2007 Volvo S60 60
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  27 S60s, 10.4 months of data per S60, average 87200 miles

 

2006 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 80
60% 60% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  27 E-Classes, 10.0 months of data per E-Class, average 101100 miles
2006 Volvo S60 97
80% 80% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  48 S60s, 10.3 months of data per S60, average 110600 miles

 

2005 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  17 E-Classes, 8.0 months of data per E-Class, average 123700 miles

* Small sample, members only.
2005 Volvo S60 75
50% 50% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  38 S60s, 10.1 months of data per S60, average 122800 miles

 

2004 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  16 E-Classes, 7.7 months of data per E-Class, average 142000 miles

* Small sample, members only.
2004 Volvo S60 91
60% 60% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  62 S60s, 9.8 months of data per S60, average 142500 miles

 

2003 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  13 E-Classes, 8.3 months of data per E-Class, average 103600 miles

* Very small sample, members only.
2003 Volvo S60   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  20 S60s, 8.9 months of data per S60, average 156700 miles

* Small sample, members only.

 

2002 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  12 E-Classes, 7.2 months of data per E-Class, average 142000 miles

* Very small sample, members only.
2002 Volvo S60 119
70% 70% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  39 S60s, 9.8 months of data per S60, average 149500 miles

 

2001 Mercedes-Benz E-Class   small sample, members only   see reported repairs
  12 E-Classes, 9.9 months of data per E-Class, average 129200 miles

* Very small sample, members only.
2001 Volvo S60 86
40% 40% Fewest Trips Most Trips
[?] see reported repairs
  38 S60s, 9.5 months of data per S60, average 151200 miles

Redesigned.

Return to top

Was this information useful?

We're glad we could help! Share this page:

We're so sorry! Tell us how we can improve it.

Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Members can see an exclusive preview of our most recent results.
See reliability results for all Sedans and Wagons.
See reliability results for all Volvo and Mercedes-Benz vehicles.

Volvo S60 vs. Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reliability Comparisons

You won't find Volvo S60 or Mercedes-Benz E-Class reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Volvo S60 and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class truly differ in reliability.

These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Volvo S60 and Mercedes-Benz E-Class reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Volvo S60 and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Volvo S60 and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class have been recently.

What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Volvo S60

blog comments powered by Disqus

What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability and Durability of the Volvo S60

Volvo S60 Reliability and Durability: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 208hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
reported to be superior, back with an excellent warranty
2007 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 2.5L I5
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
still practical
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 208hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Have owned for 4.5 years. Wife and I purchased based on experiences of 2 family members who had good experiences. We have been stranded once (in driveway) due to faulty shift lock mechanism, otherwise have put 151,000 essentially pain-free KM on this.
2004 4dr Sedan turbocharged 247hp 2.3L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
So far no unscheduled mantianance required.
2002 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I5
5-speed automatic FWD
The non-turbocharged engine in this car will last forever, with the right maintenance and upkeep. The car only needs to see the dealership once every 7,500 miles, which is nice, and services are not overly expensive.
Volvo S60 Reliability and Durability: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual AWD
Volvo is not willing to take responsibility for the AWD system braking on the R. Many reported issues costing the customer over $2000 to repair.
2004 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
RELIABILITY, car has intermittent electrical problem that cripples the vehicle with no notice. Dealer has had the car for a combined total of over 6 weeks and still has not fixed the problem. For this reason I will never buy a Volvo again. Google "Volvo electrical problems" and you will see it quite common
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 197hp 2.4L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Lots of little problems such as the front tires rubbing the inner fender wall when having the steering wheel cranked all the way left or right. Also, began to hear a noticeable valve ticking at 60k miles.
2002 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I5
5-speed automatic FWD
Reliablilty is probably on the lower end of mediocre. This can only be said of my car and I am the second owner. I think most of the components are dependable and well made with a few exceptions. one being the bosch coil packs, they die; a different brand is cheap on ebay to replace (12.00 usd new) and work awesome but about 60.00usd + for one bosch, which suck. period. instrument cluster is finicky in some of these, including mine: (made in phillipines??, not japan etc) I say this b/c most of the car was made in belgium, germany, france and on...Mechanically the car is quite good, I don't expect anything non electrical to go anytime soon. But again, expect some minor to moderate electrical issues, esspecially if like any car it has been in an accident. all the forum horror stories about ETM and limp home mode and all that have been completely a non-issue over a year later for my s60. Volvo followed the recall for my particular car and remedied it before, I assume, it ever became an issue back in 2002.
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability and Durability of the Mercedes-Benz E-Class

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reliability and Durability: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The 2008 E-Class is far more reliable than previous E-Class models, many of which are plagued by quirky electronic issues. No such issues with this model. Perhaps the most reliable model thus far.
2007 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
They are not known for being inexpensive to maintain. While the scheduled maintenance trips are not cheap, so far I have had virtually no problems with the car. trips that are not but they are known for having
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 201hp 3.2L I6 Diesel
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Mercedes has long been known for reliability
2003 4dr Sedan 302-horsepower 5.0L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The car still drives like a solid new car at 94000 miles
Mercedes-Benz E-Class Reliability and Durability: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Poor reliability in the past 5-10 years
2008 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Driver side mirror cracked in the cold in the first 2 months. Piece of driver door trim came loose after a couple of months.
2007 4dr Sedan 507-horsepower 6.2L V8
7-speed shiftable automatic RWD
It never works right. There is always some sort of other problem. Problem after problem after problem, it never ends.
2005 4dr Sedan supercharged 469hp 5.4L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Materials look & feel great, and seem well put together, but durability is questionable. E.g., glovebox door soft close craps out, as do the tweeter "triangle" housings in the forward door corners). Airmatic suspension is known problem area.
2004 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
My repairs are mostly for simple things that should last longer. Engine and Trans are stellar.
2003 4dr Sedan 302-horsepower 5.0L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
TOO many !@#$# trips to the dealer for ball joints, ignition key failure, Total brake failure of EBS, and $1000/visit oil change
2003 4dr Sedan 302-horsepower 5.0L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Not reliable at all. Close to 100K miles and have had to replace the pump that raises the car up and won, wheel bearings and engine mounts. Very expensive. Steering wheel fluid is $30 for a quart
2003 4dr Sedan supercharged 469hp 5.4L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The W211 E class is just a mess of problems waiting to happen. Probably the biggest is the tendency of the fuel tank and two fuel senders (underneath the back seat, by the way) to leak with no fix other than to replace them at a high cost (over $3,500). The fuel sender leak happens to be right around some electrical connections as well, so it is a wonder there haven't been any notable fire incidents. This is a known issue and there is an NTSB ongoing investigation (PE12001, which has been upgraded to the next level of action) because of the high number of vehicles affected. The fact that Mercedes doesn't own up to this issue after several iterations of re-engineered parts and continued failures is the main reason I will never buy another Mercedes. I have had to have this repair done, so I speak from experience.
2003 4dr Sedan supercharged 469hp 5.4L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The second major issue that owners of the W211 can expect to have is the SBC brake system. This was implemented on the '03 - '06 W211 and it was changed on subsequent years in 2007. The SBC unit, pressure reservoir, and the other parts of the brake system can alert you to a fault and minutes later leave you without brakes. This is unacceptable. Mercedes did put out a 10 year unlimited mileage warranty on the SBC unit itself, but I'll give you one guess as to when the fault will happen! If the pressure reservoir goes out, you won't even be able to get the car out of park, even just to get it in to neutral to get a tow. The brake sensors seem to be finicky and the brake switch as well. Knowing what I know now about the failed application of SBC, I'd never purchase an E class Mercedes between the years of 2003-2006. If I were to ever look in to purchasing a Mercedes again, I would do my homework on the types of systems in place. I have had to do this repair and others on the brakes, so I speak from experience.
2003 4dr Sedan supercharged 469hp 5.4L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The third major issue the W211's have is the airmatic system. A common fault is for the airmatic struts to leak, which requires replacement. One replacement cost is $1600. If you aren't under warranty, the bill could add up quickly if more than one goes out. The airmatic system is nice in principle, but in practice this is a common ailment. I had my left front go bad, so I speak from experience.