Ford Taurus Reliability Comparisons
Based on TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey
View reliability comparisons for another model
Direct link to this page
Logged in as: Guest
This is the most up-to-date car reliability information available anywhere for the Ford Taurus. TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey results are promptly updated every three months. Others can be over a year behind. What you'll also find only here: actual repair rates (the average number of trips to the repair shop each year), and not just dots, for a clearer idea of how much competing cars truly differ in reliability.
Not a member yet? Read about TrueDelta's research and how to participate by clicking here.
Repairs reported: To view all reported repairs, click on the model.
Comments: Some results have comments. To view these, hover the cursor over a result. General notes.
Ford Taurus Reliability
Select another model
| Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending September 30, 2009 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles) Column definitions | |||||||||
| Sort | |||||||||
| Year | Make | Model |
Trips / Year | TS |
Δ | Cars Mon/Car Av Odo | |||
| 2008 | Ford |  | -- | 33 7.6 21200 | |||||
| 2003 | Ford | 17 4.0 82600 | |||||||
| 2001 | Ford | 16 7.3 86500 | |||||||
| 2000 | Ford | 16 8.3 136900 | |||||||
| 1999 | Ford | 11 7.5 114100 | |||||||
| Top of table ^ | |||||||||
Competing Car Model Reliability
| Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending September 30, 2009 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles) Column definitions | |||||||||
| Sort | |||||||||
| Year | Make | Model |
Trips / Year | TS |
Δ | Cars Mon/Car Av Odo | |||
| 2010 | Ford | 21 3.0 3600 | |||||||
| 2009 | Ford |  | 27 7.2 5600 | ||||||
| 2008 | Ford | | -21 | 51 8.8 13200 | |||||
| 2007 | Ford | | 48 8.6 29600 | ||||||
| 2006 | Ford | | 54 7.4 39600 | ||||||
| 2009 | Honda | | 40 4.3 6400 | ||||||
| 2008 | Honda | | -26 | 117 8.7 16600 | |||||
| 2007 | Honda | | 69 8.3 24900 | ||||||
| 2006 | Honda | | 70 7.2 42500 | ||||||
| 2005 | Honda | | 47 6.3 61500 | ||||||
| 2004 | Honda | | 54 8.5 62000 | ||||||
| Year | Make | Model |
Trips / Year | TS |
Δ | Cars Mon/Car Av Odo | |||
| 2003 | Honda | | 48 8.0 88600 | ||||||
| 2002 | Honda | | 31 6.0 83800 | ||||||
| 2001 | Honda | | 30 5.6 112400 | ||||||
| 2000 | Honda | | 30 6.4 122800 | ||||||
| 1999 | Honda | | 30 5.7 121000 | ||||||
| 1998 | Honda | | 28 6.0 127600 | ||||||
| 1997 | Honda | 17 5.1 150800 | |||||||
| 1996 | Honda | 10 6.7 176800 | |||||||
| 1995 | Honda | 10 6.8 162600 | |||||||
| 2009 | Lincoln | 20 5.5 7300 | |||||||
| 2006 | Toyota | 17 5.2 36700 | |||||||
| Top of table ^ | |||||||||
Car you're interested in not listed? Then either it's not a common comparison, or not enough owners participated. You can help by telling others about this research.
Definitions
- Trips / Year per 100 (CRS Score) -- average number of successful repair trips per year per 100 cars; routine maintenance such as oil and filter changes does not count as a repair
- Graph -- pointer shows how the model compares to others from the same model year
- Traffic Signal (TS) -- same as the graph, but with three simple, easier-to-read alternatives; green = better than average, yellow = about average, red = worse than average
- Delta (Δ) -- how much the CRS Score differs from the same year Ford Taurus; negative = fewer repairs = better; +100 = one extra repair trip per year, on average
- Cars -- number of cars for which owners provided data
- Months / Car -- average number of months of data per car
- Odometer -- average odometer reading, in miles; under 9,000 per year in green, over 15,000 per year in red
General Notes
How do we select "competing car models"? Users of TrueDelta's car price comparison tool most often compare these cars to the Ford Taurus.
Models and statistics marked with an asterisk* have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.
Ultra-low repair rates: Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems.
Full set of Car Reliability Survey results in one huge table.
Methodology
Description of the research process.
Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
Found this information useful, and want to help improve it while earning full access? Then become a member--it's free for participants--and help provide the data.
Ford Taurus Forums (TrueDelta partners)
These forums have helped make our results possible. For discussions of the Taurus by owners, visit:
FordTaurus.net -- Ford Taurus forum
Direct links to this page
Direct link to this page:
http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Ford&mc=94
In BB Code, for forums:
[url=http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Ford&mc=94]Ford Taurus reliability comparisons[/url]
