Mitsubishi Lancer Reliability Comparisons

Based on TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey
View reliability comparisons for another model
Direct link to this page

This is the most up-to-date car reliability information available anywhere for the Mitsubishi Lancer. TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey results are promptly updated every three months. Others can be over a year behind. What you'll also find only here: actual repair rates (the average number of trips to the repair shop each year), and not just dots, for a clearer idea of how much competing cars truly differ in reliability.

Members: to view car reliability information for:

  • up to ten competing car models, instead of up to five
  • car models for which fewer owners responded--marked "join to view"

Not a member yet? Read about TrueDelta's research and how to participate by clicking here.

Repairs reported: To view all reported repairs, click on the model.

Comments: Some results have comments. To view these, hover the cursor over a result. General notes.
 

Mitsubishi Lancer Reliability
Select another model

Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending June 30, 2010
Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles)
Column definitions
Sort
 
 
 
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2009Mitsubishi

Lancer

28

Fewest         Most

--    36
7.3
15400
2008Mitsubishi

Lancer

50

Fewest         Most

--    28
8.6
26300
Top of table ^

Competing Car Model Reliability

Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending June 30, 2010
Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles)
Column definitions
Sort
 
 
 
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2010Honda

Civic*

join to view

  19
3.6
4200
2009Honda

Civic

29

Fewest         Most

+146
9.0
11400
2008Honda

Civic

23

Fewest         Most

-2789
7.5
25400
2007Honda

Civic

33

Fewest         Most

 79
7.7
39700
2006Honda

Civic

55

Fewest         Most First year of redesigned model.

 70
6.9
54200
2005Honda

Civic

12

Fewest         Most

 28
7.0
64800
2004Honda

Civic

33

Fewest         Most

 26
5.7
79200
2003Honda

Civic Si*

join to view

  11
9.6
94300
2003Honda

Civic*

join to view

  21
6.4
91500
2002Honda

Civic

42

Fewest         Most

 32
6.3
86500
2001Honda

Civic

67

Fewest         Most

 28
8.3
115800
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2000Honda

Civic

38

Fewest         Most

 32
7.9
115100
1999Honda

Civic

52

Fewest         Most

 29
5.6
130500
1998Honda

Civic

60

Fewest         Most

 27
5.2
124600
2010Kia

Forte

50

Fewest         Most

 36
4.0
5200
2010Mazda

MazdaSpeed3*

join to view

  22
4.5
5200
2010Mazda

Mazda3

23

Fewest         Most Very clean launch for a redesigned model.

 101
6.1
7300
2009Mazda

MazdaSpeed3*

join to view

  20
9.5
14900
2009Mazda

Mazda3

34

Fewest         Most Mostly 2008.5s.

+644
8.9
18000
2008Mazda

Mazda3

39

Fewest         Most

-1152
9.5
28300
2008Mazda

MazdaSpeed3

65

Fewest         Most

+1526
7.2
21300
2007Mazda

MazdaSpeed3

63

Fewest         Most Only it its first model year does the MazdaSpeed3 have a much higher repair frequency than the regular Mazda3.

 28
8.9
33000
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2007Mazda

Mazda3

17

Fewest         Most Only it its first model year does the MazdaSpeed3 have a much higher repair frequency than the regular Mazda3.

 70
8.1
33800
2006Mazda

Mazda3

46

Fewest         Most

 62
7.6
53100
2005Mazda

Mazda3

28

Fewest         Most

 39
8.7
57400
2004Mazda

Mazda3

69

Fewest         Most First model year. Some reports of rust around the rear wheel openings, a problem shared with the Mazda5 and the Protege5.

 32
7.7
70100
2010Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport*

join to view

  17
4.4
5500
2009Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

25

Fewest         Most

-332
8.8
11500
2008Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

43

Fewest         Most

-747
7.7
22600
2007Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport*

join to view

  23
7.7
34300
2006Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

28

Fewest         Most

 27
8.0
48400
2005Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

35

Fewest         Most

 36
9.4
67100
2004Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

101

Fewest         Most

 26
6.8
76600
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2003Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport*

join to view

  12
7.3
85700
2002Subaru

Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

63

Fewest         Most

 35
7.6
95300
2010Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  23
5.3
7200
2009Toyota

Corolla

27

Fewest         Most

-151
8.6
21400
2007Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  18
5.3
37000
2006Toyota

Corolla

29

Fewest         Most

 29
8.7
48600
2005Toyota

Corolla

27

Fewest         Most

 35
7.7
74400
2004Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  18
6.8
73200
2003Toyota

Corolla

64

Fewest         Most

 31
6.1
106200
2002Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  12
7.5
118900
2001Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  18
7.3
111800
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2000Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  11
6.2
110500
1999Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  19
7.6
117900
1998Toyota

Corolla*

join to view

  11
5.9
120100
Top of table ^

Car you're interested in not listed? Then either it's not a common comparison, or not enough owners participated. You can help by telling others about this research.

Definitions

Return to survey results ^

General Notes

How do we select "competing car models"? Users of TrueDelta's car price comparison tool most often compare these cars to the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Models and statistics marked with an asterisk* have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.

Ultra-low repair rates: Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.

New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems.

Full set of Car Reliability Survey results in one huge table.

Return to survey results ^

Methodology

Description of the research process.

Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.

Found this information useful, and want to help improve it while earning full access? Then become a member--it's free for participants--and help provide the data.

Return to survey results ^

Mitsubishi Lancer Forums (TrueDelta partners)

These forums have helped make our results possible. For discussions of the Lancer by owners, visit:

9glancers.com -- Mitsubishi Lancer forum

Direct link to this page:
http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Mitsubishi&mc=216

In BB Code, for forums:
[url=http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Mitsubishi&mc=216]Mitsubishi Lancer reliability comparisons[/url]

 

site and logo design by abundant designs