Model Year | 2017 | 2023 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Mercedes-Benz EQB | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 111.3 in | -2 in |
Length | 182.8 in | 184.4 in | -1.6 in |
Width | 71.1 in | 72.2 in | -1.1 in |
Height | 55.9 in | 65.6 in | -9.7 in |
Curb Weight | 3373 lb. | 4497 lb. | -1124 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 0.0 gal. | 16 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 40.7 in | -2.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 55.9 in | -0.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 0.0 in | 53 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.1 in | 1.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.3 in | -2.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 54.9 in | -1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 0.0 in | 52.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 38.1 in | -4.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 34.8 in | -34.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.8 in | -43.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.1 in | -29.1 in |
Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 108.3 in (over 3 rows) | -32.3 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.2 ft3 | 10.7 ft3 | -0.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 22.0 ft3 | -11.8 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 ft3 | 61.8 ft3 | -51.6 ft3 |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB.