Model Year | 2013 | 2020 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Mazda CX-9 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.3 in | 115.3 in | -3 in |
Length | 190.4 in | 199.4 in | -9 in |
Width | 75.5 in | 77.5 in | -2 in |
Height | 54.2 in | 69.0 in | -14.8 in |
Curb Weight | 3780 lb. | 4225 lb. | -445 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 19.0 gal. | 0 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 37.4 in | 39.3 in | -1.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.9 in | 57.9 in | -1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.7 in | -56.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.0 in | 1.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 35.3 in | 38.5 in | -3.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 50.4 in | 58.1 in | -7.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 57.4 in | -57.4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 29.9 in | 39.4 in | -9.5 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.4 in | -35.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 53.1 in | -53.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 40.1 in | -40.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.7 in | -29.7 in |
Total Legroom | 72.3 in (over 2 rows) | 110.1 in (over 3 rows) | -37.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 11.3 ft3 | 14.4 ft3 | -3.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.3 | 38.2 ft3 | -26.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.3 ft3 | 71.2 ft3 | -59.9 ft3 |
2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-9.