Model Year | 2015 | 2014 | |
Model | Volvo V60 | Infiniti Q50 | |
Engine | turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 325 hp@6500 354 lb-ft@3000 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 328 hp@7000 269 lb-ft@5200 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 112.2 in | -2.9 in |
Length | 182.5 in | 188.3 in | -5.8 in |
Width | 73.4 in | 71.8 in | 1.6 in |
Height | 58.4 in | 56.8 in | 1.6 in |
Curb Weight | 3790 lb. | 3748 lb. | 42 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 17.8 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -2.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.2 in | -1.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 56.7 in | 0.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 53.2 in | 1.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 44.5 in | -2.6 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 37.5 in | -0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.2 in | 56.1 in | -0.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.5 in | 52.5 in | 1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 35.1 in | -1.6 in |
Total Legroom | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 79.6 in (over 2 rows) | -4.2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.2 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 1.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 43.8 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 30.3 ft3 |
2015 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review |
2015 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volvo V60.
2014 Infiniti Q50 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Like the G37, the Q50 has one of the roomiest rear seats among BMW 3-Series challengers. On paper it offers the most combined rear legroom, 44.5 inches in the front seat and 35.1 inches in back, about 2.5 more than the BMW and Lexus. But the difference doesn't seem as large as this number suggests. The Audi S4 and Cadillac ATS remain more cramped. The Q50 doesn't come by its extra room through brilliant packaging. Instead, at 188 inches it's about a half-foot longer than a 3-Series or ATS. see full Infiniti Q50 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Infiniti Q50.