Chevrolet SS vs. Suzuki Grand Vitara Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 11 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet SS and 63 fuel economy reports for the Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Chevrolet SS g/100m

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	g/100m
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	50	50	70	6.0

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet SS fuel economy data.

Suzuki Grand Vitara g/100m

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	g/100m
2011	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	light	light	5	64	18	13	80	5.1
2010	4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	22	24	24	30	100	11.4
2010	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	10	10	10	70	60	5.0
2009	4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	lead	hvy	10	40	10	40	120	31.8
2009	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	v.lt	hvy	0	0	0	100	60	4.2
2009	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	light	none	10	22	7	61	110	27.0
2009	4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	light	none	5	10	15	70	100	25.9
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	10	10	60	20	70	5.0
2008	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	hills	med	light	16	24	12	49	69	4.8
2008	4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual AWD w/low range	hills	v.lt	none	3	1	0	96	110	23.5
2007	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed manual AWD w/low range	flat	med	none	2	47	0	51	110	30.6
2007	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	15	32	8	45	81	10.6
2007	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	med	none	20	16	12	52	62	4.7
2007	4dr SUV 140-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual AWD w/low range	flat	med	hvy	20	20	5	55	100	32.9
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	v.lt	light	0	20	40	40	60	3.8
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed manual AWD	flat	lead	light	40	40	16	5	70	14.4
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	3	23	23	53	70	4.1
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	hills	light	light	7	17	18	58	79	11.8
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD	flat	light	light	7	31	23	39	87	13.5
2002	4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	med	light	0	100	0	0	0	105.8
2002	4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range	flat	light	none	3	74	8	14	65	4.4

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Suzuki Grand Vitara fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Suzuki models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet SS

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	My mention of a $1,300 gas guzzler tax foreshadowed this "why not." If you want a fuel-efficient car, you probably don't want a big, V8-powered sedan. But even compared to the Dodge Charger R/T the SS is a guzzler. This is partly because the very small number sold doesn't justify an upgrade to GM's latest engine and transmission technology, which includes variable valve timing, cylinder deactivation, and eight-speed automatic transmissions. These technologies enable the Charger R/T to earn EPA ratings of 16 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, while the SS can only manage 14/21 with a six-speed automatic or 15/21 with a six-speed manual (which skips from first to fourth under light throttle). In my real-world driving, the trip computer usually reported an average around 16 or 17 in the suburbs (20 if I drove with a very light foot) and MAYBE 24 on the highway. The trip computer in the Dodge reported averages that were usually higher by a couple MPG, but keep its engine in V4 mode (i.e. no lights to stop for) and the average can reach 30. see full Chevrolet SS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet SS

Chevrolet SS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2017	4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	Wow, really, really bad. All the reviews you may have read about the fuel economy are dead on. You can optimistically get 24 on the freeway and low teens city. Then again you are NOT buying this car for fuel economy. see full Chevrolet SS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Suzuki Grand Vitara

Suzuki Grand Vitara Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	For an SUV with all wheel drive full time and a small V6 fuel economy isn't bad at twenty miles per gallon. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	Smaller 2.7 V6 get great gas mileage, even though it has all wheel drive, 25mpg is common. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review

Suzuki Grand Vitara Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	2.7L 6 cyl. engine has a 18 mpg city 22 HWY. Not good enough. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	The fuel economy on this car could be a lot better. It can supposedly get up to 21 mpg, but we've never gotten over 17 mpg. We tak e good care of it, so I don't know what the problem is, but I would call it a gas guzzler. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review
2006	4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	Ok for a vehicle of this size and configuration, but it compares unfavourably to vehicles that although superficially the same, could be expected to do better. Like not being in 4wd all the time. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review