

Year | Make/Model | Nada Odds per 100 Cars | Lemon Odds per 100 Cars | ||
29 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 188500 miles driven2004 | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
29 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 188500 miles driven | |||||
26 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 143600 miles driven The 2005 has had a high higher repair frequency for over a year. Unclear why.2005 |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
26 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 143600 miles driven The 2005 has had a high higher repair frequency for over a year. Unclear why. |
|||||
27 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 135100 miles driven Redesigned for this model year.2007 |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
27 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 135100 miles driven Redesigned for this model year. |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
I have always been a fan of GM trucks. They have a solid reputation for long term durability and I keep my vehicles for a long time. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range |
Government Motors stigma, improving though. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2002 | 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not overly happy with GM...brake issue not covered under recall for whatever reason. Also don't apprecate the $16 Billion taxpayers will likely never see again (accordning to gov't estimates...don't take my word for it, check goggle.) see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Partly because Mitsubishi has had to rely heavily on incentives to sell outdated cars, and partly because people wonder if it'll be able to hang on much longer (if they realize it's still around at all), its brand image isn't the best. Personally, I don't expect Mitsubishi Motors to go away. If weak sales and financial losses could kill the company, or at least its American subsidiary, it would already be dead. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
20+ Years of Rally Experience, a great design team, bringing some flare to the econobox class of cars in the Nation. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual AWD |
rally race proven see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
Mitsubishi Lancer Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4 CVT FWD |
Face it, this is a Mitsubishi, a struggling brand with some very poor models dragging it down. This may affect resale value and as of 2012 Mitsubishi's future in the US is still uncertain. The Lancer is a great car but the overall brand is struggling. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |