| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Ford Escape and 2019 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2019 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 240 hp@6550 223 lb-ft@4300 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 106.2 in | -3.1 in |
| Length | 174.7 in | 179.1 in | -4.4 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 72.5 in | -1.4 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 65.3 in | 2.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3529 lb. | 3825 lb. | -296 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.5 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 1.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 57.1 in | -0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 55.2 in | -1.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 41.0 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 39.0 in | 0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.9 in | 54.8 in | 1.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 49.1 in | 55.3 in | -6.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.6 in | 39.6 in | -4 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -3.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 29.2 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -1.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.3 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | 6.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Ford Escape
| 2010 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Wide bench seat with no humps. Middle passenger has good leg room where many other vehicles have a large hump to straddle. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Surprisingly large back seat - roomier than the Explorer see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Plenty of room - includes armrests see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
| 2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
