| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2003 Ford Explorer and 2011 Mazda CX-7 Specifications
| Model Year | 2003 | 2011 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Mazda CX-7 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Explorer
| 2003 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
I needed the 3rd-row seating to keep 3 boys happy in the back seats - this was one of the main motivations for buying this SUV - and because I was so happy with my 97 Explorer. see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Other than a minivan, the explorer had much more room in the third row than other vehicles of comparable size. see full Ford Explorer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-7
| 2011 Mazda CX-7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Tight seating in rear unless seats are pulled way fwd. see full Mazda CX-7 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
