Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003 Subaru Outback Subaru Outback 2012

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Subaru Outback (2012) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2012 Subaru Outback specs.

2003 Ford Mustang and 2012 Subaru Outback Specifications

Model Year 2003 2012  
Model Ford Mustang Subaru Outback  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Subaru Outback

2012 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Wagon 256-horsepower 3.6L H6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
I am a big guy. 5'10 and about 290 lbs. This car is very comfortable for me. I can reach the controls nicely, love the heated leather seats. see full Subaru Outback review
2012 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
0 see full Subaru Outback review
2012 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
I have found our 2012 Outback to be very comfortable for long drives. The driver's seat has plenty of adjustment to accommodate my frame. Legroom is outstanding. My wife got so spoiled with the heated seats in our 99 Outback Limited that she balks at cars without. So our 2010 and now the 2012 have had the heated seats. see full Subaru Outback review
2012 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Rear seat comfort is excellent even for very tall teenagers and 20 somethings. The redesign of the Outback in 2010 noticeably improved rear seat space. One note when flipping down the back seats. Make sure your head is out of the way when you lift the release lever. The seat back springs forward quickly. The angle of the rear seat can also be reclined for additional comfort. The fold down center cup holder is a nice touch. The seating position is high so visibility is great. see full Subaru Outback review
2012 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Very comfortable. see full Subaru Outback review
2011 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Impressed with the seat comfort/adjustability/durability. 12+hours in the chair is no problem. see full Subaru Outback review
2011 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Wide space with lots of shoulder, hip, leg and head room. Seats are comfy too without being decadent. see full Subaru Outback review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.