Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003 Subaru WRX Subaru WRX 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Mustang (2003) vs. Subaru WRX (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2003 Ford Mustang and 2016 Subaru WRX specs.

2003 Ford Mustang and 2016 Subaru WRX Specifications

Model Year 2003 2016  
Model Ford Mustang Subaru WRX  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru WRX

2016 Subaru WRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2015 The Subaru WRX has always been fun to drive. But it used to be cramped inside, especially in the back seat. This is no longer an issue. The new car has more rear seat legroom than the one-size-up Legacy had during its 2005-2009 glory days. Unless your friends and family are tall, they'll fit in back. While the GTI's back seat is nearly as roomy, the Focus ST's isn't in the same ballpark. If you want rear air vents for your passengers, though, you'll have to get the VW or the Ford. Subaru doesn't offer them in the WRX. see full Subaru WRX review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru WRX

2016 Subaru WRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L H4
6-speed manual AWD
Anyone whose owned a previous-gen WRX knows rear seat space, especially leg room, as "OK" at best. Subaru has revised the rear seats to where there is now more leg room for the lucky passengers in the rear. With the driver seat adjusted to how I sit (I'm 6-feet tall and have a more upright seating position), there is about 1.5 inches of space between my knees and the driver seat back (vs. no space on the previous gen!). Comfort is pretty good, although the seats take on more of a lean on the seat back, which may/may not jive well with your passengers backs. see full Subaru WRX review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.