| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Mustang and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 102.4 in | 4.7 in |
| Length | 188.5 in | 171.9 in | 16.6 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 69.5 in | 4.4 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 61.4 in | -5.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3501 lb. | 2865 lb. | 636 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.5 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 53.3 in | 2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 52.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 39.3 in | -4.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 52.6 in | -4.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 43.7 in | 3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 36.2 in | -6.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -5.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | -6.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | -48.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
