Honda CR-V (2006) vs. GMC Terrain (2018) Specs

vs.

◆

2006 Honda CR-V and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2006	2018
Model	Honda CR-V	GMC Terrain
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	103.3 in	107.3 in	-4 in
Length	181.0 in	182.3 in	-1.3 in
Width	70.2 in	72.4 in	-2.2 in
Height	66.2 in	65.4 in	0.8 in
Curb Weight	3318 lb.	3449 lb.	-131 lb.
Fuel Capacity	15.3 gal.	14.9 gal.	0.4 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.9 in	40.0 in	0.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.9 in	57.2 in	-0.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	54.5 in	54.4 in	0.1 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.3 in	40.9 in	0.4 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.1 in	38.5 in	0.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	56.5 in	55.6 in	0.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2	53.5 in	51.8 in	1.7 in
Legroom, Row 2	39.4 in	39.7 in	-0.3 in
Total Legroom	80.7 in (over 2 rows)	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	0.1 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	33.5 ft³	29.6 ft³	3.9 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	72.0 ft³	63.3 ft³	8.7 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda CR-V

2006 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD	The leather front drivers seat and passenger is very comfortable,much more so then my 2002 Honda accord se. The leather is cold in the winter but the heated seats help a lot. see full Honda CR-V review
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Spaciousness see full Honda CR-V review
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Rear seats are quite comfortable for passengers and have plenty of legroom. Entry/exit is easy. No hesitation to drive friends to a show / dinner theater /etc. where they have to stay in back an hour or more. see full Honda CR-V review
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD	steering wheel doesnt hit knees. see full Honda CR-V review
2006	4dr SUV 156-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD	With the lack of a center console, the front feels very open and airy. see full Honda CR-V review
2005	4dr SUV 160-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Surprising comfort on long trips, excellent leg room with rear seats all the way back. Great visibility for rear passengers. see full Honda CR-V review

2006 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD	Extremely cramped for me - just hated the interior and could not get past the legroom see full Honda CR-V review
2007	4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	No room for other passengers with a baby seat in the middle. see full Honda CR-V review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.