| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Honda Fit | Mercedes-Benz R-Class | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 268 hp@6000 258 lb-ft@2400 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 126.6 in | -28.2 in |
| Length | 161.6 in | 203.0 in | -41.4 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 75.7 in | -9 in |
| Height | 60.0 in | 65.4 in | -5.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 2496 lb. | 4829 lb. | -2333 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 25.1 gal. | -14.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.8 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 60.3 in | -7.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 0.0 in | 51.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 39.8 in | 1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 40.4 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 59.6 in | -8.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 0.0 in | 51.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 36.2 in | -1.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.2 in | -37.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 52.8 in | -52.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 32.4 in | -32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 108.4 in (over 3 rows) | -32.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | 5.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 42.2 ft3 | -21.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 85.0 ft3 | -27.7 ft3 |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz R-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Three different lumbar pumps...don't seem to be very different in what is inflated. see full Mercedes-Benz R-Class review |