Honda Fit (2013) vs. Subaru Outback (2007) Specs

vs.

◆

2013 Honda Fit and 2007 Subaru Outback Specifications

Model Year	2013	2007
Model	Honda Fit	Subaru Outback
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Hatch	4dr Wagon
			Difference
Wheelbase	98.4 in	105.1 in	-6.7 in
Length	161.6 in	188.7 in	-27.1 in
Width	66.7 in	69.7 in	-3 in
Height	60.0 in	63.2 in	-3.2 in
Curb Weight	2496 lb.	3330 lb.	-834 lb.
Fuel Capacity	10.6 gal.	16.9 gal.	-6.3 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.4 in	40.5 in	-0.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	52.7 in	54.4 in	-1.7 in
Hip Room, Row 1	51.5 in	51.0 in	0.5 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.3 in	44.1 in	-2.8 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.0 in	39.1 in	-0.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	51.3 in	53.7 in	-2.4 in
Hip Room, Row 2	51.3 in	52.6 in	-1.3 in
Legroom, Row 2	34.5 in	33.9 in	0.6 in
Total Legroom	75.8 in (over 2 rows)	78 in (over 2 rows)	-2.2 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	20.6 ft³	33.5 ft³	-12.9 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	57.3 ft³	66.2 ft³	-8.9 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit

2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD	The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review

2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2013	4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review
2013	4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD	One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Subaru Outback

2007 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Footroom too short. see full Subaru Outback review
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	A little tight in the left portion of the footwell; small dead pedal. see full Subaru Outback review
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	not long enough for a 6 foot 2 inch frame but I manage see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	I was amazed at how small the back seat is in this car. Really no bigger than a compact sedan, eg Civic or Corolla. I can't fit my 3 kids (in car seats) back there, and feel bad when co-workers pile in to go to lunch. Surprisingly small for a vehicle this size, and marketed as a "family car." If you plan to put adults or 3 kids back there regularly, look at the '10 or newer (or at something else -- the rear seat in my co-worker's Accord is far bigger and more comfortable). see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Leg and head room lacking for over 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Seat back a bit low for 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Too small for kids see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Too short! I am 6ft tall and the front passenger seat leaves me feeling very cramped. Drivers position is better. Seats also too narrow. Maybe plenty of room for skinny folks, but not for us folks that are large boned :-) see full Subaru Outback review

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.