| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda CX-7 and 2016 Ford Territory Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-7 | Ford Territory | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-7
| 2012 Mazda CX-7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Tight seating in rear unless seats are pulled way fwd. see full Mazda CX-7 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Territory
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Territory.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
