| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda Mazda2 and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2018 | |
| Model | Mazda Mazda2 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | 1.5L I4 DOHC-4v 100 hp@6000 98 lb-ft@4000 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 98.0 in | 106.2 in | -8.2 in |
| Length | 155.5 in | 179.1 in | -23.6 in |
| Width | 66.7 in | 72.5 in | -5.8 in |
| Height | 58.1 in | 65.3 in | -7.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 2359 lb. | 3563 lb. | -1204 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 11.3 gal. | 14.8 gal. | -3.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.1 in | 39.7 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.8 in | 57.1 in | -4.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 50.9 in | 55.2 in | -4.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 41.0 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 39.0 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.2 in | 54.8 in | -3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 55.3 in | -8.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 39.6 in | -4.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -3.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.3 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -17.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 27.0 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -32.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda Mazda2
| 2012 Mazda Mazda2 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 100-horsepower 1.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Adequate, but no more, for a large 6 footer. see full Mazda Mazda2 review |
| 2012 Mazda Mazda2 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 100-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are pretty good but the headrests are poorly executed. They either poke the passenger in the back or put their head in an uncomfortable position. see full Mazda Mazda2 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
