| Model Year | 2002 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mazda Tribute | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
| 2002 Mazda Tribute Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Enough space for knees even for tall passengers. see full Mazda Tribute review |
| 2001 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
I have nice leather seats and the power drivers seat with lumbar control is very nice. see full Mazda Tribute review |
| 2002 Mazda Tribute Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
A bit short seat and not enough supportive. see full Mazda Tribute review |
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.