Model Year | 2007 | 2019 | |
Model | Nissan Quest | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 235 hp@5800 240 lb-ft@4400 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 124.0 in | 106.2 in | 17.8 in |
Length | 204.1 in | 179.1 in | 25 in |
Width | 77.6 in | 72.5 in | 5.1 in |
Height | 71.9 in | 65.3 in | 6.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4291 lb. | 3825 lb. | 466 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.1 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 5.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 39.7 in | 2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.7 in | 57.1 in | 6.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 65.6 in | 55.2 in | 10.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.0 in | 0.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 41.7 in | 39.0 in | 2.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 66.2 in | 54.8 in | 11.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 67.4 in | 55.3 in | 12.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 42.1 in | 39.6 in | 2.5 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.6 in | 0.0 in | 37.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.6 in | 0.0 in | 61.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 50.0 in | 0.0 in | 50 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 39.6 in | 0.0 in | 39.6 in |
Total Legroom | 123.4 in (over 3 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 42.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 32.3 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | 1.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 87.7 ft3 | 30.9 | 56.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 145.7 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | 86.1 ft3 |
2007 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Superior to other minivans in ease of entry, available legroom, and comfort. see full Nissan Quest review |
2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
2007 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The seat is not as comfortable as Chrysler or Toyota. This is not an issue except for very long trips (6-8 hrs). see full Nissan Quest review |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.