| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Nissan cube and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Nissan cube | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,530 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 3,975 mm | 4,783 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,694 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,651 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,253 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 61 L | -11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,240 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,209 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 777 mm | 125 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,979 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 323 L | 382 L | -59 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,645 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan cube
| 2010 Nissan cube Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
Unparalleled rear seat room and comfort in this car for passengers. Should be among the easier cars of this size to put a baby seat into the back, if we have children. Our (longer and lower) 2004 Sentra paled in comparison of back seat usability. see full Nissan cube review |
| 2010 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
Adults can sit there in comfort. see full Nissan cube review |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4 CVT FWD |
SEATS ARE COMFY FOR LONG TRIPS. DO NOT BEAT THE HELL OUT OF YOU. see full Nissan cube review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
