| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Toyota 4Runner and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 106.3 in | 3.5 in |
| Length | 189.2 in | 178.7 in | 10.5 in |
| Width | 75.2 in | 69.3 in | 5.9 in |
| Height | 69.3 in | 58.1 in | 11.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 4045 lb. | 3075 lb. | 970 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 23.0 gal. | 11.3 gal. | 11.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 39.4 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.0 in | 55.0 in | 3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 53.4 in | 1.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 43.2 in | -1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 37.4 in | 1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 53.0 in | 4.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 51.9 in | 3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 33.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 32.9 in | 0.0 in | 32.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.7 in | 0.0 in | 56.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.4 in | 0.0 in | 48.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.1 in | 0.0 in | 24.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 100.5 in (over 3 rows) | 76.6 in (over 2 rows) | 23.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 24.6 ft3 | -12.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 36.6 ft3 | 24.6 | 12 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 75.1 ft3 | 62.7 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota 4Runner
| 2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of room in the backs seat, and actually decent 3rd row seating for the kids. Kills the cargo area though. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room for 3 people. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
After a trip to TX from CO my back was hurting. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
the front seat is too close to the floor. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
