Toyota Land Cruiser vs. Toyota MR2 Spyder Fuel Economy (g/100m)

The graph does not display if there are fewer than five results.

Chart is based on 11 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Land Cruiser and 2 fuel economy reports for the Toyota MR2 Spyder.

Toyota Land Cruiser g/100m

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	g/100m
2009	4dr SUV 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range	flat	light	none	0	0	40	60	60	6.7
2003	4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	light	light	5	10	70	15	70	6.0
2002	4dr SUV 230-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic AWD w/low range	flat	med	light	15	15	10	60	65	7.6
2000	4dr SUV 230-horsepower 4.7L V8 4-speed automatic AWD w/low range	hills	light	light	5	12	14	69	63	6.8

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Land Cruiser fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	g/100m
2002	2dr Convertible 138-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	15	3	10	73	63	3.1