| Model Year | 2008 | 2013 | |
| Model | Volvo C30 | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,639 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,252 mm | 4,590 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,783 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,452 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 58 L | 2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 970 mm | 1,298 mm | 969 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 1,283 mm | 924 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,194 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,054 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 861 mm | 978 mm | -117 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 365 L | 2,212 L | 363 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 572 L | 3,831 L | 569 L |
| 2008 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I tested both the Mini Cooper and Volvo C30. The C30, by far, is the most comfortable and easy to find a great driving position. Driving from Los Angeles to San Francisco without any back or shoulder fatigue! see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I have sat in the seat for three plus hours with no discomfort. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats are a bit short on leg room. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is tight, this is a small hatch coupe afterall. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat is really make for children and not adults see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.