Mercedes-Benz C-Class Reliability Comparisons

Based on TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey
View reliability comparisons for another model
Direct link to this page

This is the most up-to-date car reliability information available anywhere for the Mercedes-Benz C-Class. TrueDelta's Car Reliability Survey results are promptly updated every three months. Others can be over a year behind. What you'll also find only here: actual repair rates (the average number of trips to the repair shop each year), and not just dots, for a clearer idea of how much competing cars truly differ in reliability.

Members: to view car reliability information for:

  • up to ten competing car models, instead of up to five
  • car models for which fewer owners responded--marked "join to view"

Not a member yet? Read about TrueDelta's research and how to participate by clicking here.

Repairs reported: To view all reported repairs, click on the model.

Comments: Some results have comments. To view these, hover the cursor over a result. General notes.
 

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Reliability
Select another model

Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending June 30, 2010
Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles)
Column definitions
Sort
 
 
 
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2009Mercedes-Benz

C-Class

44

Fewest         Most The 2008 was about the same a year ago.

--    32
6.8
11400
2008Mercedes-Benz

C-Class

28

Fewest         Most

--    52
8.4
18700
2007Mercedes-Benz

C-Class*

join to view

  19
6.5
31600
2006Mercedes-Benz

C-Class*

join to view

  12
10.3
44400
2005Mercedes-Benz

C-Class

51

Fewest         Most

--    31
6.8
66700
2004Mercedes-Benz

C-Class*

join to view

  15
5.9
57900
2003Mercedes-Benz

C-Class*

join to view

  16
7.4
85600
2002Mercedes-Benz

C-Class*

join to view

  10
7.2
62600
Top of table ^

Competing Car Model Reliability

Car Reliability Survey (CRS) Results: year ending June 30, 2010
Successful Repair Trips per Year (per 100 vehicles)
Column definitions
Sort
 
 
 
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2008Acura

TL

43

Fewest         Most

+1531
8.1
23700
2007Acura

TL

35

Fewest         Most

 29
7.0
29800
2006Acura

TL

49

Fewest         Most

 32
6.9
44900
2005Acura

TL

25

Fewest         Most

-2636
9.4
54000
2004Acura

TL

35

Fewest         Most

 36
9.4
69100
2003Acura

TL / CL*

join to view

  18
6.2
100200
2002Acura

TL / CL*

join to view

  13
6.8
119800
2001Acura

TL / CL*

join to view

  12
5.3
108300
2000Acura

TL*

join to view

  19
4.7
129700
2010Audi

A4

36

Fewest         Most Second model year, much better than people expect from an Audi so far. S4 repair frequency similar to the A4 once consider lower average odometer.

 68
5.0
5900
2010Audi

S4

27

Fewest         Most Second model year, much better than people expect from an Audi so far. S4 repair frequency similar to the A4 once consider lower average odometer.

 29
3.1
3900
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2009Audi

A4

72

Fewest         Most First year of the B8, and appears to continue the average repair frequency of the B7 A4. Common problem with the front suspension.

+28105
8.0
11800
2008Audi

A4

59

Fewest         Most

+3147
7.7
25000
2007Audi

S4*

join to view

  17
6.9
30700
2007Audi

A4

55

Fewest         Most Small sample size for S4 performance variant. Seems to require fewer repairs than the A4 on which it's based, but note lower average odometer.

 69
7.5
38200
2006Audi

A4

85

Fewest         Most Includes 2005.5. Much lower repair frequency than B6 A4. Small sample size for S4 performance variant. Seems to require fewer repairs than the A4 on which it's based, but note lower average odometer.

 105
7.5
52300
2006Audi

S4*

join to view

  17
7.9
42700
2005Audi

A4

145

Fewest         Most

+9429
6.8
64900
2005Audi

S4*

join to view

  14
6.7
57700
2004Audi

A4

152

Fewest         Most

 35
5.2
69800
2004Audi

S4

126

Fewest         Most

 25
7.2
61500
2003Audi

A4

103

Fewest         Most Lower reported repair frequency than the 2002 or 2004. Possibly because sample size is just a bit over the minimum for a full result?

 29
6.4
90000
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2002Audi

A4

148

Fewest         Most

 50
6.7
98200
2001Audi

A4 / S4*

join to view

  18
6.0
102600
2000Audi

A4 / S4

181

Fewest         Most

 32
6.2
102200
1999Audi

A4 / S4*

join to view

  13
5.8
127800
2010BMW

3-Series / M3

12

Fewest         Most

 25
4.0
4200
2009BMW

335

87

Fewest         Most High failure rate for the High Pressure Fuel Pump in the 335i. 335d included with the 328. Low average odometer for M3.

+4332
7.8
9400
2009BMW

M3*

join to view

  14
5.6
6200
2009BMW

328

25

Fewest         Most High failure rate for the High Pressure Fuel Pump in the 335i. 335d included with the 328. Low average odometer for M3.

-1934
7.1
10000
2008BMW

335

86

Fewest         Most High failure rate for the High Pressure Fuel Pump in the 335i. 335d included with the 328. Low average odometer for M3.

+5848
8.4
19900
2008BMW

M3*

join to view

  22
5.8
12800
2008BMW

328

40

Fewest         Most High failure rate for the High Pressure Fuel Pump in the 335i. 335d included with the 328. Low average odometer for M3.

+1240
6.8
22900
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2007BMW

328

73

Fewest         Most By the time these cars are in their third year, high pressure fuel pump failures are much less common and no longer yield a much higher repair rate for the 335i than for the 328i.

 62
7.5
32700
2007BMW

335

90

Fewest         Most By the time these cars are in their third year, high pressure fuel pump failures are much less common and no longer yield a much higher repair rate for the 335i than for the 328i.

 74
8.4
28700
2006BMW

3-Series 4dr

75

Fewest         Most

 92
7.7
49400
2005BMW

3-Series

118

Fewest         Most Possibly a blip at the end of the standard warranty, to get things fixed before the warranty runs out.

+6729
8.4
57800
2004BMW

3-Series

87

Fewest         Most Very low average odometer and/or very small sample size for M3 might explain low reported repair frequency.

 54
7.4
63300
2004BMW

M3*

join to view

  10
7.3
36800
2003BMW

3-Series

108

Fewest         Most

 38
7.9
73700
2002BMW

3-Series

99

Fewest         Most

 37
7.5
85800
2002BMW

M3*

join to view

  13
6.2
64200
2001BMW

3-Series

141

Fewest         Most

 47
8.0
94300
2000BMW

3-Series*

join to view

  19
6.2
133300
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
1999BMW

3-Series - E46*

join to view

  14
7.4
146200
1999BMW

3-Series - E36*

join to view

  10
6.4
99100
1998BMW

3-Series / M3*

join to view

  19
5.1
141100
1995BMW

3-Series / M3*

join to view

  16
3.6
146800
2008Lexus

IS*

join to view

  15
8.5
17100
2007Lexus

IS*

join to view

  15
5.6
36100
2006Lexus

IS*

join to view

  18
6.1
43100
2010Mercedes-Benz

E-Class

59

Fewest         Most

 33
4.3
3500
2008Mercedes-Benz

E-Class*

join to view

  21
6.1
24100
2007Mercedes-Benz

E-Class

100

Fewest         Most

 38
6.3
35100
2006Mercedes-Benz

E-Class

65

Fewest         Most

 36
6.2
44000
YearMakeModel

Trips / Year
per 100

TS

Δ

Cars
Mon/Car
Av Odo
2005Mercedes-Benz

E-Class

85

Fewest         Most

+3426
7.6
74800
2001Mercedes-Benz

E-Class*

join to view

  16
4.5
94600
1999Mercedes-Benz

E-Class*

join to view

  16
4.1
99700
Top of table ^

Car you're interested in not listed? Then either it's not a common comparison, or not enough owners participated. You can help by telling others about this research.

Definitions

Return to survey results ^

General Notes

How do we select "competing car models"? Users of TrueDelta's car price comparison tool most often compare these cars to the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.

Models and statistics marked with an asterisk* have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.

Ultra-low repair rates: Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.

New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems.

Full set of Car Reliability Survey results in one huge table.

Return to survey results ^

Methodology

Description of the research process.

Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.

Found this information useful, and want to help improve it while earning full access? Then become a member--it's free for participants--and help provide the data.

Return to survey results ^

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Forums (TrueDelta partners)

TrueDelta does not currently have a partner forum for this model.

If you know a forum administrator who might be interested, please suggest that they contact us.

Direct link to this page:
http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Mercedes-Benz&mc=179

In BB Code, for forums:
[url=http://www.truedelta.com/car-reliability.php?stage=pt&bd=Mercedes-Benz&mc=179]Mercedes-Benz C-Class reliability comparisons[/url]

 

site and logo design by abundant designs