Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2015 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | none | 5 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 75 | 22.259 | |
2015 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | none | 5 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 75 | 22.3 | |
Averages | hills | med | none | 5 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 75 | 22.3 | ||
With the 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2015 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
22.3 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2015 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 75 miles per hour (about 40 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (35 percent), in the city (20 percent), and in heavy traffic (5 percent). In addition the average 2015 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on hilly terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2014 | 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | none | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 15.800 | |
2014 | 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | none | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.8 | |
Averages | flat | med | none | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.8 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, the 2014 Chevrolet Camaro has been averaging
15.8 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2014 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly in the city (about 90 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (10 percent), in the suburbs (0 percent), and on the highway at an average speed of 0 miles per hour (0 percent). In addition the average 2014 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2013 | 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | light | 11 | 17 | 28 | 44 | 80 | 24.321 | |
2013 | 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | light | 11 | 17 | 28 | 44 | 80 | 24.3 | |
Averages | hills | med | light | 11 | 17 | 28 | 44 | 80 | 24.3 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro gas mileage has been averaging
24.3 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2013 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 80 miles per hour (about 44 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (28 percent), in the city (17 percent), and in heavy traffic (11 percent). In addition the average 2013 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on hilly terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 35 | 55 | 60 | 18.525 | |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 35 | 55 | 60 | 18.5 | |
Averages | flat | med | none | 0 | 10 | 35 | 55 | 60 | 18.5 | ||
With the 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
18.5 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2012 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 60 miles per hour (about 55 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (35 percent), in the city (10 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2012 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 23.077 | |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 23.1 | |
Averages | flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 23.1 | ||
With the 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro has been averaging
23.1 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2012 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 75 miles per hour (about 100 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in heavy traffic (0 percent), in the suburbs (0 percent), and in the city (0 percent). In addition the average 2012 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | hvy | 10 | 30 | 10 | 50 | 75 | 18.200 | |
2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | hvy | 10 | 30 | 10 | 50 | 75 | 18.2 | |
Averages | flat | med | hvy | 10 | 30 | 10 | 50 | 75 | 18.2 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro gas mileage has been averaging
18.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2012 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 75 miles per hour (about 50 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (30 percent), in heavy traffic (10 percent), and in the suburbs (10 percent). In addition the average 2012 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on most or all of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 25 | 75 | 60 | 17.188 | |
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 60 | 16.226 | |||
2011 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | light | 0 | 40 | 18 | 43 | 60 | 16.7 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 0 | 40 | 18 | 43 | 60 | 16.7 | ||
With the 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
16.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2011 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 60 miles per hour (about 43 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (40 percent), in the suburbs (18 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2011 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 19.107 | |
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 20.408 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 80 | 26.011 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 17.733 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 18.556 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 80 | 24.569 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 19.603 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 43 | 57 | 80 | 23.715 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 24.875 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 24.936 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 19.556 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 25.107 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 24.463 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 80 | 24.910 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 25.056 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 28.459 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 75 | 25.865 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 29.537 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 18.529 | |||
hills | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 24.552 | |||
flat | med | light | 26 | 17 | 40 | 17 | 70 | 18.600 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 22.227 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 26.381 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 75 | 20.519 | |||
hills | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 24.912 | |||
hills | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 75 | 24.879 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 15.704 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 75 | 21.948 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 25.484 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 18.709 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | 75 | 29.240 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 18.385 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 19.021 | |||
hills | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 25.748 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 20.054 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 80 | 23.127 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 27.498 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 22.885 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 75 | 24.652 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 80 | 20.070 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | 75 | 26.619 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 19.639 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 17.875 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 20.384 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 18.381 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 22.663 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 80 | 20.139 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 19.910 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 19.710 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 75 | 18.793 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | 75 | 29.687 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 80 | 25.144 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 99 | 75 | 27.469 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 18.385 | |||
hills | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 25.716 | |||
hills | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 75 | 28.923 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 19.602 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 21.854 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 19.763 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 90 | 10 | 80 | 18.569 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 19.737 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 27.677 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 19.829 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 26.582 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 80 | 22.893 | |||
hills | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 26.321 | |||
flat | lead | none | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 24.177 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 75 | 19.571 | |||
2011 | 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | lead | light | 0 | 2 | 36 | 62 | 77 | 22.7 | |
Averages | flat | lead | light | 0 | 2 | 36 | 62 | 77 | 22.7 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro has been averaging
22.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2011 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 77 miles per hour (about 62 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (36 percent), in the city (2 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2011 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a lead foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | lead | light | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 80 | 20.875 | |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
hills | lead | light | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 80 | 20.9 | |
Averages | hills | lead | light | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 80 | 20.9 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro gas mileage has been averaging
20.9 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2011 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 80 miles per hour (about 80 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (20 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and in the suburbs (0 percent). In addition the average 2011 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on hilly terrain with a lead foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | light | none | 0 | 5 | 0 | 95 | 65 | 26.506 | |
flat | med | none | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 65 | 22.000 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 5 | 95 | 70 | 25.700 | |||
flat | light | none | 0 | 15 | 0 | 85 | 60 | 23.000 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 70 | 28.300 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 65 | 21.141 | |||
mtns | med | light | 5 | 15 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 21.286 | |||
flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 81 | 18.500 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 112 | 17.800 | |||
hills | med | hvy | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 17.800 | |||
flat | lead | light | 10 | 10 | 70 | 10 | 75 | 18.600 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 87 | 18.500 | |||
flat | med | none | 5 | 15 | 5 | 75 | 68 | 30.500 | |||
flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 87 | 18.200 | |||
flat | lead | light | 15 | 25 | 0 | 60 | 80 | 19.500 | |||
flat | lead | light | 20 | 0 | 20 | 60 | 80 | 20.000 | |||
flat | light | none | 0 | 17 | 17 | 67 | 60 | 21.000 | |||
2010 | 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | med | light | 3 | 10 | 17 | 70 | 73 | 21.7 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 3 | 10 | 17 | 70 | 73 | 21.7 | ||
With the 426-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
21.7 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 73 miles per hour (about 70 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (17 percent), in the city (10 percent), and in heavy traffic (3 percent). In addition the average 2010 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | light | light | 20 | 5 | 5 | 70 | 70 | 20.200 | |
flat | light | light | 20 | 5 | 5 | 70 | 70 | 20.600 | |||
flat | light | none | 0 | 2 | 3 | 95 | 60 | 22.000 | |||
flat | lead | light | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 22.500 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | N/A | 16.300 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 0 | 29 | 71 | 75 | 20.500 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 10 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 75 | 15.800 | |||
flat | med | light | 0 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 80 | 16.300 | |||
flat | med | none | 0 | 40 | 35 | 25 | 80 | 15.000 | |||
flat | med | light | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | N/A | 16.900 | |||
flat | med | light | 10 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 75 | 13.000 | |||
flat | med | light | 5 | 10 | 25 | 60 | 75 | 18.000 | |||
2010 | 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | light | 5 | 22 | 28 | 45 | 74 | 18.1 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 5 | 22 | 28 | 45 | 74 | 18.1 | ||
With the 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro has been averaging
18.1 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 74 miles per hour (about 45 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (28 percent), in the city (22 percent), and in heavy traffic (5 percent). In addition the average 2010 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
hills | med | light | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 19.900 | |
hills | med | none | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 65 | 23.700 | |||
flat | light | none | 5 | 5 | 5 | 85 | 55 | 24.626 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 24.400 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 10 | 30 | 0 | 60 | 65 | 19.300 | |||
hills | med | light | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 20.600 | |||
flat | light | none | 10 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 70 | 14.000 | |||
flat | light | none | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90 | 65 | 26.000 | |||
flat | lead | light | 46 | 54 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 18.900 | |||
flat | light | hvy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 24.900 | |||
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
flat | med | light | 7 | 25 | 14 | 55 | 62 | 21.6 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 7 | 25 | 14 | 55 | 62 | 21.6 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro gas mileage has been averaging
21.6 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 62 miles per hour (about 55 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (25 percent), in the suburbs (14 percent), and in heavy traffic (7 percent). In addition the average 2010 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | med | none | 0 | 20 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 18.900 | |
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 31.000 | |||
flat | light | none | 19 | 23 | 26 | 32 | 65 | 29.900 | |||
flat | med | none | 21 | 23 | 24 | 33 | 65 | 24.000 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 10 | 25 | 50 | 15 | 70 | 16.000 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 25.800 | |||
hills | med | none | 2 | 9 | 28 | 60 | 65 | 24.533 | |||
flat | light | light | 0 | 5 | 10 | 85 | 65 | 27.970 | |||
flat | med | none | 10 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 70 | 18.900 | |||
flat | med | none | 10 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 70 | 18.700 | |||
flat | light | none | 21 | 22 | 22 | 34 | 60 | 25.000 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 19 | 22 | 25 | 34 | 60 | 25.000 | |||
2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | med | light | 9 | 17 | 30 | 44 | 67 | 23.8 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 9 | 17 | 30 | 44 | 67 | 23.8 | ||
With the 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
23.8 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2010 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly on the highway at an average speed of 67 miles per hour (about 44 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the suburbs (30 percent), in the city (17 percent), and in heavy traffic (9 percent). In addition the average 2010 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2002 | 2dr Hatch 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
flat | lead | hvy | 5 | 15 | 35 | 45 | 80 | 19.200 | |
flat | med | light | 5 | 5 | 30 | 60 | 65 | 21.660 | |||
flat | med | light | 5 | 5 | 20 | 70 | 70 | 21.725 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 5 | 15 | 40 | 40 | 70 | 20.000 | |||
flat | med | none | 5 | 10 | 40 | 45 | 75 | 21.034 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 5 | 15 | 40 | 40 | 70 | 21.525 | |||
flat | med | light | 0 | 0 | 30 | 70 | 75 | 23.214 | |||
flat | med | light | 5 | 5 | 30 | 60 | 65 | 21.446 | |||
flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 95 | 5 | 70 | 15.048 | |||
flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 95 | 5 | 70 | 15.085 | |||
flat | light | light | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 70 | 16.151 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 10 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 80 | 20.382 | |||
flat | lead | hvy | 5 | 60 | 30 | 5 | 80 | 16.026 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 5 | 10 | 43 | 43 | 80 | 20.000 | |||
flat | med | light | 5 | 5 | 20 | 70 | 65 | 23.689 | |||
flat | med | hvy | 5 | 5 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 22.132 | |||
2002 | 2dr Hatch 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
flat | med | light | 4 | 12 | 43 | 41 | 72 | 19.9 | |
Averages | flat | med | light | 4 | 12 | 43 | 41 | 72 | 19.9 | ||
With the 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 engine, 4-speed automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive, the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro has been averaging
19.9 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2002 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly in the suburbs (about 43 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were on the highway at an average speed of 72 miles per hour (41 percent), in the city (12 percent), and in heavy traffic (4 percent). In addition the average 2002 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a medium foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2002 | 2dr Hatch 200-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | none | 0 | 9 | 59 | 32 | 74 | 29.100 | |
hills | med | none | 0 | 10 | 60 | 30 | 74 | 27.200 | |||
2002 | 2dr Hatch 200-horsepower 3.8L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
hills | med | none | 0 | 10 | 60 | 31 | 74 | 28.2 | |
Averages | hills | med | none | 0 | 10 | 60 | 31 | 74 | 28.2 | ||
With the 200-horsepower 3.8L V6 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro gas mileage has been averaging
28.2 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2002 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly in the suburbs (about 60 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were on the highway at an average speed of 74 miles per hour (31 percent), in the city (10 percent), and in heavy traffic (0 percent). In addition the average 2002 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on hilly terrain with a medium foot and the AC not used at all. |
|||||||||||
Year | Body/Powertrain | flat, hilly, or mountainousLand | driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot | A/C use: none to heavyA/C | constant stop and goTraf % | many stops per mileCity % | stop every mile or twoSub % | fairly steady speedHwy % | Hwy Spd | MPG | |
2002 | 2dr Convertible 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | light | light | 0 | 35 | 65 | 0 | N/A | 22.600 | |
2002 | 2dr Convertible 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
flat | light | light | 0 | 35 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 22.6 | |
Averages | flat | light | light | 0 | 35 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 22.6 | ||
With the 310-horsepower 5.7L V8 engine, 6-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy has been averaging
22.6 MPG (miles per gallon). The 2002 Chevrolet Camaros in this analysis were driven mostly in the suburbs (about 65 percent of the miles driven). The rest of the miles were in the city (35 percent), in heavy traffic (0 percent), and on the highway at an average speed of 0 miles per hour (0 percent). In addition the average 2002 Chevrolet Camaro in this analysis was driven on flat terrain with a light foot and the AC on only some of the time. |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Be the first!