Why not just continue to rely on Consumer Reports for vehicle reliability information? Because its ratings are far too vague.
Will a "better than average" car "never break?" Will a "worse than average" car be in the shop "all the time?"
In contrast, TrueDelta's research will yield new stats (see list in sidebar) that can easily be compared from car to car and that directly relate to how poor reliability affects you.
With this information (check out the hypothetical reports), you might learn that your first choice, compared to your second, is likely to take two extra trips to the shop in its first four years.
Also, TrueDelta's results will average over ten months "fresher" than CR's, because they use an annual survey and do not post results nearly as promptly.