| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Honda CR-Z and 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Honda CR-Z | Nissan 350Z / 370Z | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 95.9 in | 100.4 in | -4.5 in |
| Length | 160.6 in | 167.2 in | -6.6 in |
| Width | 68.5 in | 72.8 in | -4.3 in |
| Height | 54.9 in | 51.9 in | 3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2637 lb. | 3232 lb. | -595 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -8.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 38.2 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 54.4 in | -0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 54.6 in | -3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 42.9 in | -0.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 42.9 in (over 1 rows) | -0.2 in |
| Cargo Volume | 25.1 ft3 | 6.9 ft3 | 18.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda CR-Z
| 2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z
| 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Hatch 332-horsepower 3.7L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
It was a two seater, and I enjoy driving with people around. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch 306-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
very cramped, not designed for very long rides. Not for tall people. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
