Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
Model | Honda Fit | Lincoln Navigator | |
Engine | 1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
5.4L V8 OHC-3v 300 hp@5000 365 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 98.4 in | 118.8 in | -20.4 in |
Length | 161.6 in | 207.5 in | -45.9 in |
Width | 66.7 in | 78.7 in | -12 in |
Height | 60.0 in | 77.7 in | -17.7 in |
Curb Weight | 2577 lb. | 5555 lb. | -2978 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 28.0 gal. | -17.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.6 in | 0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.7 in | 63.3 in | -10.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.5 in | 57.9 in | -6.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 41.2 in | 0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 39.7 in | -0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 63.4 in | -12.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 58.0 in | -6.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 38.7 in | -4.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.8 in | -37.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 52.3 in | -52.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.2 in | -50.2 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 116.2 in (over 3 rows) | -40.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 18.3 ft3 | 2.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.6 | 54.6 ft3 | -34 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.3 ft3 | 104.8 ft3 | -47.5 ft3 |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
2006 Lincoln Navigator Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The rear console is a bad idea. There's no way for the kids to get to the back seat while driving. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
The driver's seat is exceedingly comfortable. Its heating and cooling features work quickly and effectively. The adjustable lumbar support is in the right place to be effective without being intrusive, and the large cushion effectively supports the my legs. As an athlete who is almost always sore or injured, I very much appreciate that the seat is high enough off the floor that my lower legs are reasonably vertical. see full Lincoln Navigator review |