| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Flex and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Flex | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 117.9 in | 98.4 in | 19.5 in |
| Length | 202.3 in | 161.6 in | 40.7 in |
| Width | 75.9 in | 66.7 in | 9.2 in |
| Height | 67.6 in | 60.0 in | 7.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4471 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1975 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.2 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 8.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 40.4 in | 1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.4 in | 52.7 in | 5.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 51.5 in | 3.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 41.3 in | -0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.5 in | 39.0 in | 1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.1 in | 51.3 in | 5.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.0 in | 51.3 in | 3.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 44.3 in | 34.5 in | 9.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.7 in | 0.0 in | 38.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 50.8 in | 0.0 in | 50.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 41.1 in | 0.0 in | 41.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 33.4 in | 0.0 in | 33.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 118.5 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 42.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.4 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -1.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 45.0 ft3 | 20.6 | 24.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 86.7 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 29.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Flex
| 2012 Ford Flex Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 355hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The seating throughout the vehicle is extremely roomy. Adults can fit comfortably in both the second and third row seats. The driver and passenger seats are also extremely comfortable. see full Ford Flex review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
