| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mercury Mountaineer and 2002 Saturn S-Series Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2002 | |
| Model | Mercury Mountaineer | Saturn S-Series | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Saturn S-Series
| 2002 Saturn S-Series Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 100-horsepower 1.9L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I am six feet tall and I have the driver's seat pushed back as far as it will go. If my legs were any longer I would need more room. For anybody six feet or shorter or who has short legs for their height, the car is perfectly fine. see full Saturn S-Series review |
| 2002 | 4dr Coupe 124-horsepower 1.9L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I expected the rear seat room to be similar to the sedan since they are built on the same wheelbase - this is not the case. Swooping roof line - a 6+ footer (myself) cannot sit without head hitting headliner! see full Saturn S-Series review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
