| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2002 BMW Z3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2002 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | BMW Z3 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 BMW Z3
| 2002 BMW Z3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.0L I6 5-speed manual RWD |
Just as cramped, but the config does not fit me as well see full BMW Z3 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
