Chevrolet SS (2017) vs. (2009) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2017 Chevrolet SS and 2009 specs.
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2009 Specifications
| Model Year |
2017 |
2009 |
|
| Model |
Chevrolet SS |
|
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
| 2009 |
0 |
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review |
| 2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 |
0 |
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.
