| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 105.1 in | 9.7 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 183.3 in | 12.2 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 70.9 in | 3.8 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 66.1 in | -8.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3997 lb. | 3274 lb. | 723 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 16.6 gal. | 2.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.6 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 56.4 in | 2.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 52.6 in | 4.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 40.9 in | 1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 38.4 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 56.0 in | 3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 51.7 in | 6.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 37.3 in | 2.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.6 in | -50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 39.4 in | -39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.2 in | -28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | -24.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.4 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 6.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 34.2 ft3 | -17.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -46.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
