| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 GMC Terrain and 2018 Audi TT Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2018 | |
| Model | GMC Terrain | Audi TT | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.3 in | 98.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Length | 182.3 in | 164.7 in | 17.6 in |
| Width | 72.4 in | 72.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 53.2 in | 12.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3449 lb. | 3164 lb. | 285 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.9 gal. | 14.5 gal. | 0.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 37.1 in | 2.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 53.6 in | 3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.4 in | 0.0 in | 54.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 41.1 in | -0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.5 in | 33.8 in | 4.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.6 in | 47.9 in | 7.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.8 in | 0.0 in | 51.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 28.9 in | 10.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 70 in (over 2 rows) | 10.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 29.6 ft3 | 12.0 ft3 | 17.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.3 ft3 | 25.1 ft3 | 38.2 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
| 2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi TT
| 2018 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| I really liked the seats in the Audi TT I reviewed a couple of years ago. Somehow I liked those in the TT RS less, even though they appear to be the same seats, just with additional adjustments. This time around the bolsters didn't provide much lateral support to my lower torso, yet felt too close together higher up even when adjusted all of the way out. I don't think I've grown significantly wider. Adding adjustable bolsters to the seats might have made them fit me worse than the fixed bolsters of the earlier seat. Your experience might vary. The tested Porsche 718 Cayman S was fitted with the base seats. As such they had few adjustments and provided only a modest amount of lateral support, but were reasonably comfortable. Three optional seats have larger side bolsters, more adjustments, or both. The BMW M2's front seats, with adjustable bolsters, deliver very good if not outstanding support and comfort. And back seats? Adults of average height can squeeze into the BMW's in a pinch. Folks under five-foot-six might do the same in the Audi's if those up front don't have their seats all the way back. The Porsche has no rear seats. see full Audi TT review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi TT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Audi TT.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all GMC models.
