We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chevrolet Volt vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Chart is based on 9 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Volt and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Chevrolet Volt MPG

Chevrolet Volt Chevrolet Volt 2017 90.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chevrolet Volt Chevrolet Volt 2014 46.7 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Chevrolet Volt Chevrolet Volt 2012 57.0 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2017 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD
hills med light 10 10 0 80 75 90.5  
2014 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
mtns light hvy 1 2 16 83 98 46.7  
2012 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
flat light none 0 3 39 59 60 57.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet Volt fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 20.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 29.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 31.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 27.7 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 23.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 29.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 27.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 29.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 32.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 33.4 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 28.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 21.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 19.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 20.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 29.2  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 26.4  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 20.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 21.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 25.7  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 31.4  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 25.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 27.7  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 23.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 25.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 29.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 27.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 30.5  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 21.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 29.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 25.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 32.4  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 21.7  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 23.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 25.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 33.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 21.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 22.0  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 22.1  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 23.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 27.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 26.2  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 28.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Volt vs. Mitsubishi Lancer MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chevrolet Volt and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Mitsubishi models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Volt

Chevrolet Volt Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2016 From the start, the primary reason to buy either the Chevrolet Volt or the Toyota Prius has been energy efficiency. Which is more efficient depends on how many miles you tend to drive each day. The Volt is a car like no other. It can travel much farther and accelerate much more quickly on electricity alone than other plug-in hybrids. Consequently, it usually operates like a fully electric vehicle (EV). Other plug-in hybrids must rely much more often on their gasoline engines. While the Volt can't travel nearly as far on electricity alone as pure EVs, they don't have a gas engine as a backup. As long as there's a fossil fuel dispensary around you never have to worry about running out of juice in the Volt. How much farther can the new Volt travel on a full charge? GM's engineers enlarged and improved the battery pack, increased the efficiency of the electric motor and transmission, and reduced the car's weight by a massive 240 pounds. These changes increased the car's battery-powered range in the EPA's test from 38 to 53 miles. The 2012-2015 Prius Plug-in Hybrid had a range of only 11 miles even with the gas engine assisting with acceleration. (The upcoming Prius Prime should do better, but will likely still have much less battery-powered range and performance than the Volt.) As in all EVs and plug-ins, though, cold weather or heavy A/C use will significantly reduce the Volt's range. If your drives are rarely long enough to run the Volt's battery down, and you live in an area where the price of electricity is at or below the national average (or discounted at night), the Volt will cost less to operate than the Prius. Be aware that the price of electricity varies far more than the price of gasoline depending on where you live. Also, with gas prices down and the Prius's fuel efficiency up, the advantage of running on electricity isn't as large as it used to be. If your electricity is expensive, the Prius will actually cost less to drive. But will gas prices remain low? If you do need to run the new Volt on gasoline, then it manages very good but not amazing fuel economy, 42 mpg combined in the EPA's tests (up from the 2011-2015's 37 mpg). The Prius Eco scored 56 mpg, and in my driving easily exceeded this number. If your focus is on the environment rather than the cost of fuel, the Volt at least potentially uses cleaner energy (depending on the source of your electricity). Fully charging the Volt via a standard household outlet can take up to 13 hours. If you regularly drive more than 25 miles per day you'll probably want to get a 240-volt charger, which reduces the charge time to about four hours. see full Chevrolet Volt review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Volt

Chevrolet Volt Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2017 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Plug-in Hybrid
CVT FWD
I bought the Volt because it meets my stringent requirements: It must run on electric only until the battery depletes, but it must also allow me to drive the 300 miles round trip to pick up my wine in Central Washington without requiring a wait to recharge. If I drive less than 55 miles per day, I can use zero gas, which happens 80% of my drives. Just shy of 5000 miles now, and I've used 20 gallons of gas and just over $100 of electricity. It's not so much the lower fuel expense for me (but it's nice to have), it's more the reduction of emissions especially in the water-power Pacific Northwest region. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2014 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
Many of us Volt owners think Chevy is under-advertising the features of the car. Our usage in three months is 3100 miles. Our tabulated mileage for gasoline is 88 MPG, or somewhere around 7 gallons a month. The largest percentage use is on the home charged 220 volt system which loads 11 kWh into the battery. Depending on outside temperature, this gives between 34 to 38 miles of electric driving, and as spring comes, it will be into the low 40's. An electric charge at the8c rate costs about a dollar. We bought a Clipper Creek 220 Volt charger... it does the task in 4 hours, and it is portable. You can charge on 110volts too, andthat takes 10 hours. You have the choice of how to use the drive system: All electric first, then gas. Or gas first, then electric. And two combined modes. In cold weather we start out with a plugged-in preheat, then go Gas Only to warm it fully, especially if the planned trip will be requiring some gas use because of the distance. For short trips, we use battery power to warm the cabin and seats. Our shopping is a 38 mile trip with a 500 foot elevation change. We do that trip so the total gas usage is 2/10ths of a gallon, sometimes 3/10ths. Our Church trips make up a large portion of the driving miles, and they are always all electric for the 22 mile trip. One thing this does is give a "good feeling" about running an errand.... it is esentally costless. GM Onstar keeps track of all energy use. But I also keep a book log. Some folks don't realize that you coulddrive this car all across the country on gas, and get 37 MPG. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2014 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
So far have driven in the winter when you get the poorest mileage on the electric motor. I have 3100 km. on the car and lifetime gas consumption is 2.6 Liters per 100km. I dont think there is another car out there that can do this well and it will get even better in the Volt as the weather warms up from the minus 12 degree weather we have had all of Jan and Feb. I LOVE NOT HAVING TO FILL UP AT THE PUMPS AND STILL HAVE NO RANGE ANXIETY. I previously have owned two Prius and the Volt is way ahead in so many ways. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2013 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
The reason you should buy a Volt is all about the fuel cost. In my case I'm averaged close to ~100 mpg (It would have been higher but for a recent 200 mile round trip to Ikea). Granted that mpg is excluding the electricity costs which in my case this car is costing ~ +$30/month increase in my electric bill so after 3 months of ownership (leased October 2012) I've used ~30 gallons of fuel (average cost $3.40 /gal) and driven 3200 miles which is ~ 6.2 cents/mile. Comparing this it a compact (Ford Focus) averaging 30 mpg with regular gas ~ $3.1 would have averaged 10 cents/mile. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2012 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
Obvious. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2012 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
I've had the Volt for 9 months and 13,000 miles. I drive it exactly like I would any of my other cars. It putts around town on errands, it goes hundreds of miles for various trips and everything in-between. Life-to-date gas mileage is 75.3--higher than I expected. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2012 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
Our lifetime average is 167 mpg after 15,000 miles! see full Chevrolet Volt review
Chevrolet Volt Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
Although the electric range on this car fits most of my needs the fuel economy when the battery is empty is poor. Typically this car will get ~35 mpg (on highway) in premium gulping engine only mode - much lower than other hybrids and worse than many compact cars costing half as much. Therefore if you regularly traveling much beyond the battery only range (say >45 miles) you'd be better served with traditional hybrid. see full Chevrolet Volt review
2012 4dr Hatch 149-horsepower Electric + Gas
CVT FWD
It's an electric car with a gas generator.. The electric range in the summer is amazing getting close to 30mi on full quiet comfort electric.. The winter MPG is horrible.. The design required the gas engine in cold weather to run the heat, it also required it to keep the batteries warm.. as a result combining the cost of electric and gas made my average around 6.8mpg in the harsh snow belt winters. see full Chevrolet Volt review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review