| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Kia Optima and 2017 Kia cee'd Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
| Model | Kia Optima | Kia cee'd | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima
| 2012 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Kia cee'd
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Kia cee'd.
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
