

Year | Make/Model | Nada Odds per 100 Cars | Lemon Odds per 100 Cars | ||
29 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 102600 miles driven This model year has been much worse than the 2009 and 2011 for over a year. Unclear why.2010 |
Mercury Mariner | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
29 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 102600 miles driven This model year has been much worse than the 2009 and 2011 for over a year. Unclear why. |
|||||
33 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 111800 miles driven Redesigned for this model year.2008 |
Mercury Mariner | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
33 vehicles, 11.5 months per vehicle, 111800 miles driven Redesigned for this model year. |
|||||
25 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 107100 miles driven2009 | Mercury Mariner | Join or sign in to view | see reported repairs | ||
25 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 107100 miles driven |
Suzuki Grand Vitara Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range |
Resale value worse then Honda/Toyota. see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range |
Although the Grand Vitara is a nice SUV - Suzuki has a poor past reputation for low quality cars. This has not changed to date. It is easy to see how Hyundi has been able to out sell Suzuki from the start.Trying to get problems solved is just to difficult see full Suzuki Grand Vitara review |
Mercury Mariner Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 0 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
mercury upscale ford see full Mercury Mariner review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
I feel it has a solid brand reputation and image as a more premium version of ford. see full Mercury Mariner review |