| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own "whys" and "why nots."
Mercury Milan Powertrain Performance Pros and Cons
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
|
2006 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons A member in Mississippi, United States Sluggish when need ending a quick start |
|
2007 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons Member954 I chose the 2.3L simply for fuel economy, but with only 160hp, it gets whipped like a mule at times to accelerate. The 5-speed transmission helps fuel economy too and does make up for some inadequacies in the engine, but the new 2.5L is a better solution. |
|
2007 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons Member4503 I was surprised how responsive the 2.3L 4cyl/5spd Auto powertrain performed. Good open road response, yet smooth, quiet cruising. |
|
2009 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons Member3008 I expected better performance from the Milan than I had in my 2000 Taurus: 10% more HP, 6 speed vs 4 speed transmission, smaller car. Performance was OK, but nothing special, and there is now a flimsy looking pulley and belt opposite the serpentine be |
|
2006 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons Member2464 2.3 I4 5spd auto was rather sluggish and would be only considered adequate. NOT for someone that likes effortless acceleration, and likes low end power that a V6 offers. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
|
2008 Mercury Milan Pros and Cons Member146 The 2.3 liter works all 160 horsepower for freeway merging. The new 2.5 liter or a future EcoBoost turbo charged engine could cure this while preserving fuel economy. Both Sonata and Malibu have smoother, quieter, more powerful powertrains and better mpg. |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
