| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z and 2013 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Nissan 350Z / 370Z | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 100.4 in | 98.4 in | 2 in |
| Length | 167.2 in | 161.6 in | 5.6 in |
| Width | 72.8 in | 66.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Height | 51.9 in | 60.0 in | -8.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3232 lb. | 2496 lb. | 736 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 8.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.2 in | 40.4 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.4 in | 52.7 in | 1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 51.5 in | 3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.9 in | 41.3 in | 1.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 39.0 in | -39 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.3 in | -51.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.3 in | -51.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 34.5 in | -34.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.9 in (over 1 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | -32.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 6.9 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -13.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 6.9 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -50.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z
| 2009 Nissan 350Z / 370Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Hatch 332-horsepower 3.7L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
It was a two seater, and I enjoy driving with people around. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch 306-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
very cramped, not designed for very long rides. Not for tall people. see full Nissan 350Z / 370Z review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Honda Fit
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
