| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Suzuki Forenza / Reno Reliability by Model Generation
Results are for year ending June 30, 2018. Only successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year and Model | % of Average Repair Frequency |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Suzuki Forenza / Reno
| Suzuki Forenza / Reno Reliability And Durability: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
This car has been 100% reliable for me, knock on wood. I've never done anything besides routine maintenance. The drivetrain is solid if uninteresting. It has been a low cost of ownership Korean mule. full 2006 Suzuki Forenza / Reno review |
| Suzuki Forenza / Reno Reliability And Durability: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 127-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I have been stranded 2 times, and my wife has been stranded 1 time in this car. Steering sensor, transmission sensor, O2 sensors, catalytic converter, fuel injectors, and struts have all had to be replaced. full 2007 Suzuki Forenza / Reno review |
