MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Honda CR-Z vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 97 fuel economy reports for the Honda CR-Z and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Honda CR-Z MPG

Honda CR-Z Honda CR-Z 2014 40.5 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Honda CR-Z Honda CR-Z 2012 41.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Honda CR-Z Honda CR-Z 2012 32.6 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Honda CR-Z Honda CR-Z 2011 40.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Honda CR-Z Honda CR-Z 2011 41.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 2dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 hills light light 0 16 67 17 70 40.5  
2012 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
7-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light none 0 20 0 80 70 41.5  
2012 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 0 0 0 100 60 32.6  
2011 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
7-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light light 3 28 19 50 60 40.4  
2011 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 4 10 36 50 65 41.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda CR-Z fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 35.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 21.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 30.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 31.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 28.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 28.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 27.1  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 35.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 23.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Honda CR-Z vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Honda CR-Z and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models and Volkswagen models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Honda CR-Z

Honda CR-Z Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 2dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 I have averaged about 40 MPG for the 3500 miles I have driven. I feel this is very good since most of my driving has lots of hills, stops, turns, and the speed limit on our interstate highways is 70 MPH. see full Honda CR-Z review
2011 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 In real life, potential to be much better than official ratings. My 6 speed manual current average in all winter driving (have not driven during the summer yet) stands at 43 mpg (us). see full Honda CR-Z review
2011 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 Great on gas see full Honda CR-Z review
2011 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid
6-speed manual FWD		 MPG is quite variable. I've seen 28 in short city driving up to 48 when hypermiling on the highway. see full Honda CR-Z review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review